Social Media YouTube essay part 2

Social Media YouTube essay part 2 Social Media: YouTube essay part 2 Social Media: YouTube essay part 2Social Media: YouTube essay part  1Users publishing their videos on YouTube are almost free being limited in publishing explicit videos and some other videos only which are either illegal or offensive for publication and contradict to rules of YouTube. The freedom of creativity is, therefore, enormous and people create diverse videos implementing their most daring ideas, while users respond to those videos and determine which videos become mainstream and which do not.Furthermore, YouTube becomes an important social media which can be used for sharing socially important information, such as video records of socially important events or culturally significant events, and so on. In this regard, the performativity of YouTube is particularly high.However such performativity often raises the high risk of the violation of privacy and intellectual property rights. For instance, the publication of videos from a concert may violate the right of an artist or singer (Lombe Ssewamala 38). In this regard, YouTube has developed the policy of the protection of the copyright law and intellectual property rights but still there are plenty of videos that violate those rights of the rights’ owners. However, such violation of human rights, including the privacy right and intellectual property rights is the ultimate manifestation of the performativity-orientation of YouTube.Furthermore, along with sheer documentary videos, there are plenty of fake videos created by users to publish on YouTube. These videos also reveal the performativity of YouTube because they stimulate the creativity of users to make a performance, a show that will attract other users. These videos are the sheer creativity of users but the point is apparently to attract the attention of the audience and increase the interest of users to the videos. In this regard, the performativity of videos apparently becomes prior to the content or messages conveyed by users. In fact, the content or message may be insignificant or even absent.At this point, it is important to dwell upon the social significance of YouTube as the social media. On the one hand, there are many admirers, who view YouTube as the great social media which allows users to share videos and to communicate video messages to the global audience instantly. The performativity of videos and YouTube as the social media attracts the huge audience and helps users to share videos successfully.On the other hand, there are many critics of YouTube, who view the social media as the media violating privacy and intellectual property rights and publishing controversial videos from the ethical point of view (Lombe Ssewamala 38). In such a situation, YouTube is perceived as the social media that causes numerous controversies caused by the violation of basic rights of individuals and organizations. The efforts of YouTube to protect those rights are not very successful so far, although the current policies of YouTube provide certain protection to the privacy and intellectual property rights or copyright.At the same time, what is beyond a doubt is the popularity of YouTube and its contribution to the mainstream culture. At this point, it is possible to refer to the case of pop music since many singers have already started to use the full potential of YouTube to promote their new works. This trend reveals the full extent to which YouTube becomes performativity-oriented because users, including pop singers and stars use YouTube as the tool to promote their works and their brands. On the other hand, YouTube allows average users to become stars, if they manage to create a performative video and attract many users. At this point, it is possible to refer to the experience of the now popular pop singer, Psy, who was absolutely unknown internationally but after his video clips were published on YouTube and gained a large number of views, he became one of the most popular pop stars today.Thus, ta king into account all above mentioned, it is important to place emphasis on the fact that YouTube is an influential social media that is fully oriented on the performativity because it is the performativity that attracts many users and makes YouTube the mainstream social media. At the same time, YouTube has a considerable impact on the contemporary culture because it contributes to the formation of contemporary cultural values, trends and norms. For instance, videos popular on YouTube contribute to the formation of certain cultural norms and values, which people perceive as mainstream because of their popularity on YouTube. However, in spite of its performativity, YouTube is still a controversial social media because the problem of the violation of intellectual property rights, copyright law, possible threat to the privacy right of people and other issues make functioning of YouTube questionable. In such a situation, the popularity of YouTube is the major factor determining the resi stance of YouTube to any accusations and claims concerning possible violation of human rights.

Achillobator - Facts and Figures

Achillobator - Facts and Figures Name: Achillobator (combination Greek/Mongolian for Achilles warrior); pronounced ah-KILL-oh-bate-ore Habitat: Plains of central Asia Historical Period: Late Cretaceous (95-85 million years ago) Size and Weight: About 20 feet long and 500-1,000 pounds Diet: Meat Distinguishing Characteristics: Large size; huge claws on feet; odd alignment of hips About Achillobator As far as paleontologists can tell, Achillobator (the name, Achilles warrior, refers both to this dinosaurs large size and to the large Achilles tendons it must have had in its feet) was a raptor, and thus in the same family as Deinonychus and Velociraptor. However, Achillobator does appear to have possessed some quirky anatomical features (mainly concerning the alignment of its hips) that differentiated it from its more famous cousins, which has led some experts to speculate that it may represent an entirely new type of dinosaur. (One other possibility is that Achillobator is a chimera: that is, it was reconstructed from the remains of two unrelated dinosaur genera that happened to be buried in the same location.) Like other raptors of the Cretaceous period, Achillobator is often depicted as sporting a coat of feathers, underlining its close evolutionary relationship with modern birds. However, this is based not any solid fossil evidence, but the presumed featheriness of small theropod dinosaurs at some stage during their life cycles. In any case, at up to 20 feet long from head to tail and 500 to 1,000 pounds, Achillobator was one of the largest raptors of the Mesozoic Era, exceeded only in size by the truly gigantic Utahraptor (which lived halfway around the world, in early Cretaceous North America) and making the much smaller Velociraptor seem like a chicken by comparison.